Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Gunnar Miller's avatar

The "forced buyers" framing is exactly right, and a "the fix is in" analogy practically writes itself. Nasdaq didn't just bend its rules, it revealed what those rules actually were: Negotiable, for the right client. The seasoning period existed to protect passive investors from being force-fed freshly-priced shares before markets had time to discover a fair value. Waiving it doesn't just benefit SpaceX, it sets a precedent that OpenAI, Anthropic and every future mega-IPO will now expect as standard.

The circularity is the real scandal. SpaceX's $1.75 trillion valuation is partly justified by the near-certainty that tens of billions in passive money will flow in mechanically on listing day. The valuation inflates the index weight, the index weight triggers the forced buying, the forced buying supports the valuation. Retail index investors consented to none of it.

Some may call it "dumb money." The more precise term might be "captive money". Nasdaq didn't sell SpaceX to the public. It sold the public to SpaceX.

3 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?