Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Matt Kornfield's avatar

Have you explored the tax angle? Might be harder to suss out from the data, but I'd bet that LLCs that hold investment properties are a huge part of the boom. I think sure, it's not a business, but it's a liability and tax strategy to hold property this way. On one podcast I listened to a guy had one per investment property, so he had ~200.

Satta Sarmah Hightower's avatar

I'm going to push back on the fake business boom here and suggest that many of these companies may not be fake — they may be solo businesses. Just because a business doesn't create tons of jobs doesn't make it any less viable than a founder-led startup.

Also, there's nothing wrong with starting a business on the side. For many people, that W-2 job or corporate career is the first funder of their budding business. Access to capital is a real issue. Often, it's not a question of commitment, but of resources.

And one last thing (before I get off my soapbox :), for many entrepreneurs, scale now means going deeper instead of wider. Not everyone aspires to own a big business, but more people do aspire to own an aligned business — one that doesn't drive them into the ground or burn them out.

The Phoebe Gates fakery is another issue. Some companies may be fudging their numbers. I certainly agree that our culture is obsessed with founderdom, but that doesn't mean the majority of these businesses are fake.

37 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?