Ed, again, great post. One small correction. Israel assassinated the Iranian leadership. It is illegal for anyone, including the President to assassinate a head of state. This resulted from the Church Committee investigation of CIA activities. 18 U.S.C. § 1116: This U.S. statute criminalizes the killing or attempted killing of foreign officials, official guests, or internationally protected persons.
Wow… for the article overall, and for my emotional reaction to its fatalism. However, there‘s not one aspect, I could disagree with. I wonder, Ed, which opinion you have on this subject outside of your professional role. As in, what do you say to your gf for instance? I mean, it was important to get a viewpoint, that counterbalances everyone else‘s nonchalant position towards the Iran situation/war/escalation, you name it. I just hope in hindsight, the article could be labelled as an overreactive position. In any case, great job.
Ed, again, great post. One small correction. Israel assassinated the Iranian leadership. It is illegal for anyone, including the President to assassinate a head of state. This resulted from the Church Committee investigation of CIA activities. 18 U.S.C. § 1116: This U.S. statute criminalizes the killing or attempted killing of foreign officials, official guests, or internationally protected persons.
Im sorry but I think it’s clear that our regime doesn’t respect laws or traditions
"Regime Change: It doesn’t work. And yet here we are, trying it again, and expecting different results. The definition of insanity."
Thanks for courage to speak out.
Re: Your closing sentiment- you're assuming that the orange one can learn. Not so sure about that.
Wow… for the article overall, and for my emotional reaction to its fatalism. However, there‘s not one aspect, I could disagree with. I wonder, Ed, which opinion you have on this subject outside of your professional role. As in, what do you say to your gf for instance? I mean, it was important to get a viewpoint, that counterbalances everyone else‘s nonchalant position towards the Iran situation/war/escalation, you name it. I just hope in hindsight, the article could be labelled as an overreactive position. In any case, great job.